The goal of this project was to investigate the content of the water from and around the University of Rochester. I took eight samples from various locations in hopes of investigating the differences within these samples. Once the samples were collected, drops of the water were placed on a silica wafer on a sample stub and allowed to dry. These samples were then sputtercoated with approximatley 6 nm of gold in order to render them conductive. They were then viewed using the Institute of Optics at the University of Rochester’s Zeiss-Leo DSM982 scanning electron microscope (SEM). Images were taken using the backscattered electrons detector (BSD), the In-Lens detector, and the secondary electron detector. Compositional analysis was completed using the x-ray spectrometer and x-ray mapping was utilized to image the samples based on composition. After the images were collect some were colorized to highlight regions of importance or compositional differences.
Bottled Water
Melted Ice Cubes
Toilet Bowl Water
Bathroom Tap Water
Soda Fountain Water
Water Bottle Refill Station
Genesee River Water
The University of Rochester recently installed several Elkay EZH2O bottle filling stations as part of its Go Green initiative. These stations, as seen at Elkay - Hydration Water Filling Station, have been placed on campus to provide students with a convenient and easy way to fill their reusable water bottles with filtered water. The sample used in this report was taken from the water bottle refill station outside of the IT Center when its filter status was 'green.'
Figure 11: SE2 image and X-ray analysis of a grain found within the Water Bottle Refill Station water sample. The X-ray analysis suggests this is some organic material (carbon and oxygen is present) mixed with a couple different salts (sodium, magnesium, sulfur, chlorine, potassium, and calcium are all present in varying concentrations).
Figure 12: The figure on the left is a SE2 image of an unknown object found in the water from the Water Bottle Refill Station. It is possible that it is a freshwater diatom. The image on the right is an In-Lens image of the patterns left on the silica wafer after the sample dried.
Figure 13: This is a SE2 image and X-ray analysis of what appears to be a shard of aluminium.
While imaging these samples a few contaminants were noticed in many, if not all, of the samples. A few of these contaminants were imaged and are shown below.
Figure 20: This is a shard of silica, possibly from the silica wafer the sample was dried on. However, it could also be a diatom, with the silica wafer behind it increasing the silica signal by so much that the telltale sign of oxygen was lost. It was found in the soda fountain water sample, but many more were seen in all of the samples.
Figure 21: SE2 image of some sort of slime-like material that contaminated many of the sample stubs. This was found in the bottled water sample.